/
Navigation
C
Chronicles
Browse all articles
C
E
Explore
Semantic exploration
E
R
Research
Entity momentum
R
N
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
N
~
Story Arc
Topic evolution
S
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
D
P
Posts
Analysis & commentary
P
Browse
@
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
?
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
!
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
+
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
*
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
vs
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
/\
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
!!
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Nav: C E R N
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
VOICE ARCHIVE

Charlie Bullock

@charliebul58993
20 posts
2026-03-07
This is illuminating re: DoW's thinking, but it doesn't remotely justify the decision to declare Anthropic a supply chain risk. 3252 defines “supply chain risk” as follows: “The term ‘supply chain risk’ means the risk that an adversary may sabotage, maliciously introduce
2026-03-07 View on X
CNBC

Google and Amazon join Microsoft in saying they will keep working with Anthropic on non-defense projects after DOD designated Anthropic a supply chain risk

https://www.cnbc.com/...Sasha de Marigny:Thank you, Google, for your leadership, partnership and continued support.  —  https://lnkd.in/...

This is illuminating re: DoW's thinking, but it doesn't remotely justify the decision to declare Anthropic a supply chain risk. 3252 defines “supply chain risk” as follows: “The term ‘supply chain risk’ means the risk that an adversary may sabotage, maliciously introduce
2026-03-07 View on X
Financial Times

A draft guidance from the US GSA tightens rules for civilian AI contracts to require AI companies to allow “any lawful” use by the government of their models

The Trump administration has drawn up tight rules for civilian artificial intelligence contracts that would require AI companies …

This is illuminating re: DoW's thinking, but it doesn't remotely justify the decision to declare Anthropic a supply chain risk. 3252 defines “supply chain risk” as follows: “The term ‘supply chain risk’ means the risk that an adversary may sabotage, maliciously introduce
2026-03-07 View on X
Pirate Wires

Interview with Pentagon AI head Emil Michael on his view that Anthropic leaked negotiations to the press to win anti-Trump users, dealing with Amodei, and more

what if this software went down?  Some guardrail kicked up?  Some refusal happened for the next fight like this one and we left our people at risk?”  “I went to @SecWar @PeteHegset...

2026-03-06
This is illuminating re: DoW's thinking, but it doesn't remotely justify the decision to declare Anthropic a supply chain risk. 3252 defines “supply chain risk” as follows: “The term ‘supply chain risk’ means the risk that an adversary may sabotage, maliciously introduce
2026-03-06 View on X
CNBC

Google and Amazon join Microsoft in saying they will keep working with Anthropic on non-defense projects after DOD designated Anthropic a supply chain risk

Google said it will continue offering Anthropic's artificial intelligence technology for clients, excluding for defense work …

This is illuminating re: DoW's thinking, but it doesn't remotely justify the decision to declare Anthropic a supply chain risk. 3252 defines “supply chain risk” as follows: “The term ‘supply chain risk’ means the risk that an adversary may sabotage, maliciously introduce
2026-03-06 View on X
Pirate Wires

An interview with Pentagon AI head Emil Michael about Anthropic leaking to the media to win anti-Trump users, dealing with Amodei and his “politburo”, and more

Pirate Wires:NEW

This is illuminating re: DoW's thinking, but it doesn't remotely justify the decision to declare Anthropic a supply chain risk. 3252 defines “supply chain risk” as follows: “The term ‘supply chain risk’ means the risk that an adversary may sabotage, maliciously introduce
2026-03-06 View on X
Anthropic

Dario Amodei says Anthropic plans to fight the DOD's risk designation in court, claims the DOD's letter has a “narrow scope”, and apologizes for his leaked memo

Yesterday (March 4) Anthropic received a letter from the Department of War confirming that we have been designated …

2026-03-03
I agree with Alan's overall claim in this piece (Anthropic will very likely sue and win), but I disagree with his analysis on one important point. I think that Anthropic's case is actually even stronger than Alan's and Michael's analysis suggests, because the statutory “judicial
2026-03-03 View on X
Bloomberg

Sources: amid negotiations with the DOD, Anthropic submitted a bid to compete in a $100M DOD contest to develop voice-controlled, autonomous drone swarming tech

Anthropic PBC was among the artificial intelligence companies that submitted a proposal earlier this year to compete …

Initial takes: 1. This seems like a significant improvement over the previous language with respect to surveillance, and I'm glad to see it. 2. It does not address autonomous weapons concerns, nor does it claim to. 3. It's hard to say anything definite without seeing the
2026-03-03 View on X
Financial Times

Sam Altman says OpenAI amended its DOD contract to ensure “the AI system shall not be intentionally used for domestic surveillance of US persons and nationals”

Sam Altman says company is working with defence department on provisions covering mass surveillance

I agree with Alan's overall claim in this piece (Anthropic will very likely sue and win), but I disagree with his analysis on one important point. I think that Anthropic's case is actually even stronger than Alan's and Michael's analysis suggests, because the statutory “judicial
2026-03-03 View on X
Lawfare

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's and Trump's actions against Anthropic have serious legal issues, and its designation exceeds what the statute authorizes

This is designation as political theater: a show of force that will not stick.  —  alanrozenshtein.com  —  Meet The Authors

2026-02-28
It's not 100% clear, but this post makes it sound like USG is going to stop using Anthropic's products over the course of a 6-month phase-out, but not declare Anthropic a supply chain risk (or use the DPA to force them to make WarClaude). Far from the worst possible outcome!
2026-02-28 View on X
Anthropic

Anthropic says it'll challenge “any supply chain risk designation in court” and that the designation would only affect contractors' use of Claude on DOD work

Earlier today, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth shared on X that he is directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply chain risk.

Hegseth claims that this declaration that no Pentagon contractor or supplier can do business with Anthropic is “effective immediately,” which seems absolutely insane. Under 10 USC 3252, which is almost certainly the authority Hegseth has to rely on here, there are multiple
2026-02-28 View on X
@secwar

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth directs the DOD to designate Anthropic as a supply chain risk, barring military contractors from doing business with the company

This week, Anthropic delivered a master class in arrogance and betrayal as well as a textbook case of how not to do business with the United States Government or the Pentagon. Our ...

Interesting that Hegseth says “no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic.”  My understanding is that the statute only allows DOW to prohibit contractors from using Claude for covered procurements (essentially, IT procurements for defense-contracting-relevant stuff) — not for “any commercial activity.”
2026-02-28 View on X
@secwar

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth directs the DOD to designate Anthropic as a supply chain risk, barring military contractors from doing business with the company

This week, Anthropic delivered a master class in arrogance and betrayal as well as a textbook case of how not to do business with the United States Government or the Pentagon. Our ...

It's not 100% clear, but this post makes it sound like USG is going to stop using Anthropic's products over the course of a 6-month phase-out, but not declare Anthropic a supply chain risk (or use the DPA to force them to make WarClaude). Far from the worst possible outcome!
2026-02-28 View on X
CNBC

Claude hit #2 on Apple's US App Store, hours after the DOD designated Anthropic a supply chain risk; it bounced between #20 and #50 for much of February

Anthropic's Claude artificial intelligence assistant app jumped to the No. 2 slot on Apple's chart of top U.S. free apps late on Friday …

It's not 100% clear, but this post makes it sound like USG is going to stop using Anthropic's products over the course of a 6-month phase-out, but not declare Anthropic a supply chain risk (or use the DPA to force them to make WarClaude). Far from the worst possible outcome!
2026-02-28 View on X
Axios

President Trump calls Anthropic a “radical left, woke company” and says he is directing every federal agency in the US to stop using its products

The Trump administration has decided to blacklist Anthropic in the most consequential and controversial policy decision to date …

Interesting that Hegseth says “no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic.”  My understanding is that the statute only allows DOW to prohibit contractors from using Claude for covered procurements (essentially, IT procurements for defense-contracting-relevant stuff) — not for “any commercial activity.”
2026-02-28 View on X
Anthropic

Anthropic says it'll challenge “any supply chain risk designation in court” and that the designation would only affect contractors' use of Claude on DOD work

Earlier today, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth shared on X that he is directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply chain risk.

Hegseth claims that this declaration that no Pentagon contractor or supplier can do business with Anthropic is “effective immediately,” which seems absolutely insane. Under 10 USC 3252, which is almost certainly the authority Hegseth has to rely on here, there are multiple
2026-02-28 View on X
Anthropic

Anthropic says it'll challenge “any supply chain risk designation in court” and that the designation would only affect contractors' use of Claude on DOD work

Earlier today, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth shared on X that he is directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply chain risk.

It's not 100% clear, but this post makes it sound like USG is going to stop using Anthropic's products over the course of a 6-month phase-out, but not declare Anthropic a supply chain risk (or use the DPA to force them to make WarClaude). Far from the worst possible outcome!
2026-02-28 View on X
@secwar

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth directs the DOD to designate Anthropic as a supply chain risk, barring military contractors from doing business with the company

This week, Anthropic delivered a master class in arrogance and betrayal as well as a textbook case of how not to do business with the United States Government or the Pentagon. Our ...

2026-02-27
It's not 100% clear, but this post makes it sound like USG is going to stop using Anthropic's products over the course of a 6-month phase-out, but not declare Anthropic a supply chain risk (or use the DPA to force them to make WarClaude). Far from the worst possible outcome!
2026-02-27 View on X
Axios

President Trump calls Anthropic a “radical left, woke company” and says he is directing every federal agency in the US to stop using its products

The Trump administration has decided to blacklist Anthropic in the most consequential and controversial policy decision to date …

2025-07-01
AI safety ecosystem maybe needs to reckon harder with how it keeps winning every single major policy fight. @ShakeelHashim 😉
2025-07-01 View on X
Bloomberg

The Senate votes 99-1 to remove a Trump tax bill provision that would have barred states from regulating AI if they got funding from a $500M broadband program

The Senate killed a controversial effort to prevent US states from regulating artificial intelligence, marking a loss …

2025-06-27
The reason you should oppose this AI moratorium or “temporary [10-year] pause” is that it's a premature and foolishly committal way of resolving the complex and nuanced issue of how authority to regulate AI should be distributed btwn states & the federal govt 🧵
2025-06-27 View on X
Bloomberg

Sources: Senate Parliamentarian raised concerns that the tax bill's ban on states from enforcing AI regulations may violate Senate rules, advising a rewrite

Bloomberg :