/
Navigation
C
Chronicles
Browse all articles
C
E
Explore
Semantic exploration
E
R
Research
Entity momentum
R
N
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
N
~
Story Arc
Topic evolution
S
↻
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
D
P
Posts
Analysis & commentary
P
Browse
@
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
◇
Domains
Browse by publication source
☉
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
?
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
!
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
+
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
*
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
vs
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
/\
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
!!
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Nav: C E R N
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
VOICE ARCHIVE

Jennifer Pan

@jenjpan
8 posts
2023-07-29
Contrary to common belief, chronological feed did not significantly alter polarization, politics knowledge, or other survey-based outcomes, even though chronological feed led users to spend much less time on FB and Insta + changed what content they saw. [image]
2023-07-29 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

Ekeoma E. Uzogara Authors Info & Affiliations  —  pp.  386-387 Washington Post : Changing Facebook's algorithm won't fix polarization, new study finds Science : How do social media...

View original
In the 2nd paper, we removed reshared content from Facebook feeds. This decreased political news participants saw in feeds, reduced their clicks on partisan news sources & reduced news knowledge but didn't affect polarization or other attitudes. https://www.science.org/... [image]
2023-07-29 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

Ekeoma E. Uzogara Authors Info & Affiliations  —  pp.  386-387 Washington Post : Changing Facebook's algorithm won't fix polarization, new study finds Science : How do social media...

View original
Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing https://www.nature.com/... by @BrendanNyhan Jamie Settle @emilythorson @mwojcieszak
2023-07-29 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

Ekeoma E. Uzogara Authors Info & Affiliations  —  pp.  386-387 Washington Post : Changing Facebook's algorithm won't fix polarization, new study finds Science : How do social media...

View original
Today, 2 papers I coauthored w/ @andyguess @namalhotra @p_barbera are out in Science. These papers, about the role of social media in American democracy, are based on pre-registered experiments with consenting participants conducted w/ @Meta #SocialMediaAndElections
2023-07-29 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

Ekeoma E. Uzogara Authors Info & Affiliations  —  pp.  386-387 Washington Post : Changing Facebook's algorithm won't fix polarization, new study finds Science : How do social media...

View original
2023-07-28
Contrary to common belief, chronological feed did not significantly alter polarization, politics knowledge, or other survey-based outcomes, even though chronological feed led users to spend much less time on FB and Insta + changed what content they saw. [image]
2023-07-28 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

In four new studies, researchers found complicated results from experiments on Facebook's and Instagram's algorithms …

View original
In the 2nd paper, we removed reshared content from Facebook feeds. This decreased political news participants saw in feeds, reduced their clicks on partisan news sources & reduced news knowledge but didn't affect polarization or other attitudes. https://www.science.org/... [image]
2023-07-28 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

In four new studies, researchers found complicated results from experiments on Facebook's and Instagram's algorithms …

View original
Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing https://www.nature.com/... by @BrendanNyhan Jamie Settle @emilythorson @mwojcieszak
2023-07-28 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

In four new studies, researchers found complicated results from experiments on Facebook's and Instagram's algorithms …

View original
Today, 2 papers I coauthored w/ @andyguess @namalhotra @p_barbera are out in Science. These papers, about the role of social media in American democracy, are based on pre-registered experiments with consenting participants conducted w/ @Meta #SocialMediaAndElections
2023-07-28 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

In four new studies, researchers found complicated results from experiments on Facebook's and Instagram's algorithms …

View original