shuaichenchang

Now we're trusting AI to detect AI-generated content more than we trust AI-generated content itself haha. To be clear, I have full respect for the people who put in the effort to make this analysis possible. From my own experience: I have one submission where all four reviews

2025-11-30 View on X

Nature

Pangram Labs: ~21% of the 75,800 peer reviews submitted for ICLR 2026, a major ML conference, were fully AI-generated, and 50%+ contained signs of AI use

By - Miryam Naddaf 0 — Miryam Naddaf is a science writer based in London. — Search author on: — PubMed Google Scholar

View original

@gneubig @pangramlabs From my own experience: I have one submission where all four reviews were flagged as “Fully AI-generated.” Interestingly, I actually found the reviews quite reasonable, and we're addressing them seriously. I've also reviewed five papers myself. I write the reviews on my own and

2025-11-30 View on X

Nature

Pangram Labs: ~21% of the 75,800 peer reviews submitted for ICLR 2026, a major ML conference, were fully AI-generated, and 50%+ contained signs of AI use

By - Miryam Naddaf 0 — Miryam Naddaf is a science writer based in London. — Search author on: — PubMed Google Scholar

View original

Now we're trusting AI to detect AI-generated content more than we trust AI-generated content itself haha. To be clear, I have full respect for the people who put in the effort to make this analysis possible. From my own experience: I have one submission where all four reviews

2025-11-29 View on X

Nature

Pangram Labs: ~21% of the 75,800 peer reviews submitted for ICLR 2026, a major ML conference, were fully AI-generated, and 50%+ contained signs of AI use

By - Miryam Naddaf 0 — Miryam Naddaf is a science writer based in London. — Search author on: — PubMed Google Scholar

View original

@gneubig @pangramlabs From my own experience: I have one submission where all four reviews were flagged as “Fully AI-generated.” Interestingly, I actually found the reviews quite reasonable, and we're addressing them seriously. I've also reviewed five papers myself. I write the reviews on my own and

2025-11-29 View on X

Nature

Pangram Labs: ~21% of the 75,800 peer reviews submitted for ICLR 2026, a major ML conference, were fully AI-generated, and 50%+ contained signs of AI use

By - Miryam Naddaf 0 — Miryam Naddaf is a science writer based in London. — Search author on: — PubMed Google Scholar

View original

This reminds me of when Apple announced they launched five new emojis 🙂‍↔️ lol. But honestly, this is great progress. Getting LLMs to follow instructions at the token level is harder than it looks. Now I'm gonna try teaching it to talk without prompting itself into a new task

2025-11-16 View on X

TechCrunch

OpenAI says ChatGPT will now avoid em dashes if users tell it to; em dashes have become telltale signs that supposedly signals text written by AI

Sam Altman celebrates ChatGPT finally following em dash formatting rules The Economic Times : OpenAI fixes ChatGPT's em dash problem; ‘small-but-happy-win’ says Sam Altman Kahekash...

View original

This reminds me of when Apple announced they launched five new emojis 🙂‍↔️ lol. But honestly, this is great progress. Getting LLMs to follow instructions at the token level is harder than it looks. Now I'm gonna try teaching it to talk without prompting itself into a new task

2025-11-15 View on X

TechCrunch

OpenAI says ChatGPT will now ditch em dashes if users tell it to; em dashes have become telltale signs that supposedly signals text written by AI

OpenAI says ChatGPT will now ditch the em dashes if you tell it to. The telltale sign that supposedly signals text written by AI has popped …

View original